PaCMAP-embedded convolutional neural network for multi-omics data integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims: The multi-omics data integration has emerged as a prominent avenue within the healthcare industry, presenting substantial potential for enhancing predictive models. The main motivation behind this study stems from the imperative need to advance prognostic methodologies in cancer diagnosis, an area where precision is pivotal for effective clinical decision-making. In this context, the present study introduces an innovative methodology that integrates copy number alteration (CNA), DNA methylation, and gene expression data. Methods: The three omics data were successfully merged into a two-dimensional (2D) map using the PaCMAP dimensionality reduction technique. Utilizing the RGB coloring scheme, a visual representation of the integration was produced utilizing the values of the three omics of each sample. Then, the colored 2D maps were fed into a convolutional neural network (CNN) to forecast the Gleason score. Results: Our proposed model outperforms the cutting-edge i-SOM-GSN model by integrating multi-omics data and the CNN architecture with an accuracy of 98.89, and AUC of 0.9996. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of multi-omics data integration in predicting health outcomes. The proposed methodology, combining PaCMAP for dimensionality reduction, RGB coloring for visualization, and CNN for prediction, offers a comprehensive framework for integrating heterogeneous omics data and improving predictive accuracy. These findings contribute to the advancement of personalized medicine and have the potential to aid in clinical decision-making for prostate cancer patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".