Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’égalité comme valeur semble avoir de nos jours une place particulière dans la philosophie du droit. En effet, plus que toute autre, l’aspiration à l’égalité est devenue le palimpseste de toute communauté moderne. Toutefois, la question de sa prédominance sur les autres valeurs - et notamment la liberté - s’affirme de plus en plus comme une problématique d’actualité. À travers une perspective historique et philosophique, l’égalité s’affirme comme une valeur dont la genèse se trouve au coeur de la « démotique » occidentale. Ainsi, la notion a été tour à tour appréhendée comme la transposition juridique d’une forme d’égalité primordiale, comme un instrument de protection égale de certaines libertés fondamentales, comme un principe politique de participation à la démocratie, la formulation des conditions d’accès équitable aux ressources, une égalité des chances ou une égalité de traitement devant les instances judiciaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".