MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389333298 · doi:10.7202/1105857ar

QUEL EST L’AVENIR DU GRIEF PATRONAL ?

2013· article· fr· W4389333298 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carole Sénéchal

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de droit Université de Sherbrooke · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le développement du syndicalisme a en quelque sorte bridé l’arbitraire de l’employeur en milieu de travail en assumant la défense des intérêts de certains groupes de salariés par l’entremise de la négociation périodique des conditions de travail. Désormais, le syndicat majoritaire accrédité et l’employeur sont tenus de négocier de bonne foi une convention collective définissant les droits et obligations de chacun. Devant cette dissolution de l’autorité de la direction, on assiste peu à peu à l’émergence du phénomène relativement récent du grief patronal en vue de dénoncer le non-respect par la partie syndicale des dispositions de la convention collective. Force est toutefois de constater que les sentences arbitrales disposant des griefs patronaux demeurent rarissimes, ce qui n’est probablement pas étranger à la baisse du taux de syndicalisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de droit Université de SherbrookeSame topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207