MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Postmortem: Explanations for the Consolidation of the Hungarian Authoritarian Turn after 2010

2023· article· en· W4389336001 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katalin Fábián

Bibliographic record

VenueHungarian Studies Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuthoritarianismConsolidation (business)HegemonyPoliticsPolitical economyPolitical scienceDisciplineHistorySociologyLawEconomicsDemocracyAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This book review essay builds on previous analysis that appeared in Hungarian Studies Review (vol. 48, no. 2, Spring 2021), as it recognizes the past three years and compares a new set of six recently published scholarly monographs that provide explanations of the causes and consequences of the consolidation of authoritarian rule in Hungary since 2010. Together, the otherwise diverse thematic and disciplinary foci of these books converge in establishing the interlocking historical, economic, and political factors that have allowed for the emergence and deepened the hegemony of thus far four consecutive Orbán governments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHungarian Studies ReviewSame topicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational StudiesFrench-language works237,207