MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fostering the National Interest: Utilizing Hungarian State Property in the Jiu Valley to Build a Modern Coal Industry

2023· article· en· W4389336225 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anca Glont

Bibliographic record

VenueHungarian Studies Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernization theoryPrivate propertyIndustrialisationState (computer science)Profit (economics)CoalPolitical scienceBusinessProperty rightsEconomyEngineeringEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract After the 1867 Ausgleich, the Kingdom of Hungary sought to foster coal extraction to fuel the growing needs of transport and industrialization. In developing the rich deposits of the Jiu Valley in Transylvania, the state did not wait for private, profit-driven development. Instead, the ministries in Budapest both developed state-operated mines in the region and supported private companies’ efforts, shifting the relative importance of each over the following four decades as the situation required. The ministries worked with private corporations to design model “company towns” and provided consistent support for their upkeep—demonstrating the extensive nature of state influence at the local level. The Jiu coal mines as a case study reflect that the Hungarian state saw property not simply in economic terms but as part of a wider framework of the modernization of the country, including its society. Royal Hungary’s property regime was one that provided legal recognition of the right to private property, but at the same time one in which the state frequently intervened to ensure economic development that served its perceived interests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.413
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.038 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHungarian Studies ReviewSame topicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational StudiesFrench-language works237,207