MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389338026 · doi:10.13035/h.2023.11.02.42

El lugar del exemplum y la claridad de estilo en «Trabajos del vicio» (1680) de Simón de Castelblanco

2023· article· es· W4389338026 on OpenAlex
Diego Medina Poveda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHipogrifo Revista de literatura y cultural del Siglo de Oro · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Architecture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inserta en la deriva ascética que tomó la narrativa en las postrimerías del seiscientos, Trabajos del vicio (1680), novela profana escrita por el padre agustino Simón de Castelblanco, representa un ejemplo paradigmático del estado de la última prosa del Barroco. A la luz de obras coetáneas como Engaños de mujeres de Miguel de Montreal y Engaños y desengaños del profano amor de José Zatrilla, en el presente trabajo estudiaré el binomio ético-estético del delectare et prodesse, cifrado por la poética horaciana, en la novela del fraile agustino. Como se verá en el artículo, Castelblanco, en un afán por la nitidez del discurso didáctico-moral, en consonancia con los postulados de san Agustín, rescata para la composición de su obra elementos del sermón popular y recurre al exemplum ficcional como forma predilecta del prodesse para la demostración de la doctrina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it