El lugar del exemplum y la claridad de estilo en «Trabajos del vicio» (1680) de Simón de Castelblanco
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inserta en la deriva ascética que tomó la narrativa en las postrimerías del seiscientos, Trabajos del vicio (1680), novela profana escrita por el padre agustino Simón de Castelblanco, representa un ejemplo paradigmático del estado de la última prosa del Barroco. A la luz de obras coetáneas como Engaños de mujeres de Miguel de Montreal y Engaños y desengaños del profano amor de José Zatrilla, en el presente trabajo estudiaré el binomio ético-estético del delectare et prodesse, cifrado por la poética horaciana, en la novela del fraile agustino. Como se verá en el artículo, Castelblanco, en un afán por la nitidez del discurso didáctico-moral, en consonancia con los postulados de san Agustín, rescata para la composición de su obra elementos del sermón popular y recurre al exemplum ficcional como forma predilecta del prodesse para la demostración de la doctrina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".