MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LIDAR SLAM-AIDED VEHICULAR NAVIGATION SYSTEM FOR GNSS-DENIED ENVIRONMENTS

2023· article· en· W4389356461 on OpenAlexaff
Nader Abdelaziz, Ahmed El‐Rabbany

Bibliographic record

VenueISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsSatellite systemComputer scienceExtended Kalman filterInertial navigation systemNavigation systemKalman filterGNSS augmentationLidarGlobal Positioning SystemSimultaneous localization and mappingReal-time computingAir navigationRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceGeographyTelecommunicationsInertial frame of referenceMobile robotRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Typically, in situations where Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals are unavailable, navigation systems rely on integrating GNSS and inertial navigation system (INS) data. While such integration can provide accurate positioning during short GNSS signal outages, it cannot sustain prolonged GNSS outages. The reason for this is that the system's performance depends solely on the INS and can result in significant errors over time. To address this issue, additional onboard sensors are necessary. This study proposes a navigation system that integrates INS and LiDAR simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) using an extended Kalman filter (EKF). The system was tested using the raw KITTI dataset in various outdoor driving scenarios without GNSS signals. It is shown that the proposed system significantly outperformed the INS-only system, with an average RMSE improvement of around 93% and 58% in the horizontal and the up directions, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207