MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389358531 · doi:10.1039/d3ma00491k

Highly conductive biocarbon nanostructures from burlap waste as sustainable additives for supercapacitor electrodes

2023· article· en· W4389358531 on OpenAlexafffund
Haftom Weldekidan, Singaravelu Vivekanandhan, Neelima Tripathi, Amar K. Mohanty, Manjusri Misra

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity Grants CommissionCanada Foundation for InnovationFedDev OntarioCanada Research ChairsOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsUniversity Grants Commission - South Eastern Regional OfficeMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsSupercapacitorMaterials scienceElectrical conductorElectromagnetic shieldingElectrodeEnergy storageNanostructureNanotechnologyComposite materialCapacitanceChemistryPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biocarbon materials with high electrical conductivity have received great attention in many applications such as energy storage/conversion, EMI shielding and electrical/electronic components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials AdvancesSame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207