Characterization and Selection of WiFi Channel State Information Features for Human Activity Detection in a Smart Public Transportation System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robust methods are needed to detect how people are moving in smart public transportation systems. This paper proposes and characterizes effective means to accurately detect passengers. We analyze a public WiFi-based activity recognition (WiAR) dataset to extract human activity features from Channel State Information (CSI) data. To do so, CSI power changes caused by nearby human activity are analyzed. Our method first extracts multi-dimensional features using a Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT) of CSI data to capture the relevant signal features. Since the environment of a transportation system changes dynamically and non-deterministically, we propose analyzing these changes with a heuristic algorithm that leverages a decision tree to automate a decision-making solution for feature selection. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is performed before the decision tree algorithm. Reported results are compared with those obtained from the existing methods. Based on these results, we explore the effectiveness of various features such as the chirp rate, delta band power, spectral flux, and frequency of movement. This allows identifying and recommending the most effective features for the explored detection task according to observed variability, information gain, and correlation between features. The reported classification results show that using only the chirp rate generated from CSI information as a feature, we achieve precision = 83%, True Positive (TP)=94%, True Negative (TN)=91% and F1-score = 87%. Considering delta band power as an additional feature adds more information and allows getting higher performance with precision = 100%, TP=97%, TN=95% and F1-score = 95%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".