Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyOriginal Research Articles1 Feb 2024Editorial CommentThis article comments on the following:Practical Use of Self-Adjusted Nitrous Oxide During Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti and Andre Luis Abreu Lorenzo Storino RamacciottiLorenzo Storino Ramacciotti Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California and Andre Luis AbreuAndre Luis Abreu Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003789.02AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Editorial Comment." The Journal of Urology, 211(2), p. 222 References 1. Practical use of self-adjusted nitrous oxide during transrectal prostate biopsy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2024; 211(2):214-222. Link, Google Scholar 2. Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia: the 'double-freehand' technique. BJU Int. 2023; 131(6):770-774. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3. Complications after systematic, random, and image-guided prostate biopsy. Eur Urol. 2017; 71(3):353-365. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesJournal of Urology20 Nov 2023Practical Use of Self-Adjusted Nitrous Oxide During Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Volume 211Issue 2February 2024Page: 222-222 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California More articles by this author Andre Luis Abreu Center for Image-Guided Surgery, Focal Therapy and Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.059 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.412 | 0.246 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".