Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ao analisarmos o verbete “Economia política” (1755) de Rousseau ressaltamos a importância do até então ineditismo do conceito da vontade geral na obra do genebrino. Pela primeira vez esta ideia basilar, do pensamento político de Jean-Jacques, ganha contornos. Ainda, nesta época, bastante influenciado pela filosofia de Diderot, em especial, por seu artigo “Direito natural”, Rousseau mostra como a vontade geral é o centro de sua economia política. No entanto, como iremos perceber no verbete, o genebrino desenvolve, em relação ao seu contemporâneo, suas próprias noções da concepção em questão afastando-se gradualmente das ideias de seu parceiro. Nosso propósito, neste estudo, é mostrar, no escrito mencionado, o que é a vontade geral para Rousseau. Para tal, dividimos esta pesquisa em três partes: na primeira, discorremos brevemente sobre a volonté générale no artigo de Diderot; na segunda, analisamos a noção da vontade geral no verbete de Rousseau; e, por fim, mostramos a ingerência de Diderot sobre Rousseau acerca do conceito da vontade geral.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".