MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389386984 · doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07718-x

A blueprint for a multi-disease, multi-domain Bayesian adaptive platform trial incorporating adult and paediatric subgroups: the Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform trial

2023· article· en· W4389386984 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert K. Mahar, Anna McGlothlin, Michael Dymock, Todd C. Lee, Roger Lewis, Thomas Lumley, Jocelyn Mora, David J. Price, Benjamin R. Saville, Tom Snelling, Rebecca Turner, Steven Webb, Joshua S. Davis, Steven Y. C. Tong, Julie Marsh, Asha C Bowen, Matthew P. Cheng, Nick Daneman, Anna L. Goodman, George Heriot, David Chien Lye, Zoe McQuilten, Susan C. Morpeth, David L. Paterson, Jason A. Roberts, Owen Robinson, Matthew Scarborough, Sebastiaan J. van Hal, Genevieve Walls, Steve Webb, Lynda Whiteway, Dafna Yahav

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersHealth Research Council of New ZealandNational Medical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchStarship FoundationDepartment of Health and Social CareMedical Research Council
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialBlueprintDiseaseModalitiesBayesian networkBayesian probabilityIntensive care medicineRandomized controlled trialComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial is a multifactorial Bayesian adaptive platform trial that aims to improve the way that S. aureus bloodstream infection, a globally common and severe infectious disease, is treated. In a world first, the SNAP trial will simultaneously investigate the effects of multiple intervention modalities within multiple groups of participants with different forms of S. aureus bloodstream infection. Here, we formalise the trial structure, modelling approach, and decision rules that will be used for the SNAP trial. By summarising the statistical principles governing the design, our hope is that the SNAP trial will serve as an adaptable template that can be used to improve comparative effectiveness research efficiency in other disease areas.Trial registration NCT05137119 . Registered on 30 November 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207