MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389393692 · doi:10.1080/15140326.2023.2289724

Monetary policy and inflation expectations: impact and causal analysis of heterogeneous economic agents’ expectations in South Africa

2023· article· en· W4389393692 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thobani Mlangeni, Eugene Msizi Buthelezi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Economics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsMonetary policyInflation (cosmology)Monetary economicsQuarter (Canadian coin)WageFinancial sectorInflation targetingBusiness cycleMacroeconomicsLabour economicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study employs a Vector Error Correction (VEC) model to investigate the dynamic relationship between changes in monetary policy and inflation expectations within various sectors.The analysis encompasses data from the financial, business, and trade union sectors, spanning the first quarter of 2000 to the fourth quarter of 2022.Results indicate that trade unions exhibit sensitivity to previous changes in the repo rate.In the long term, monetary policy influences inflation expectations within the financial sector.In contrast, elevated repo rates in the business sector correlate with diminished expectations, subsequently impacting wage dynamics.Granger causality tests establish a significant link between repo rate shifts and inflation expectations in the business and trade union sectors.The study advances the understanding of diverse sector responses to monetary policy's impact on inflation expectations, and implement sector-specific policy adjustments that consider the unique dynamics of each sector, ensuring a more targeted and effective response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied EconomicsSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207