MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389395817 · doi:10.1177/12063312231210160

Between Taking and Making Place: Exploring the Linkages Between Serres’ <i>Le Parasite</i> and the Research Practice of Creative Intervention

2023· article· en· W4389395817 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Hardy

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace and Culture · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipSociologyIntervention (counseling)Space (punctuation)AestheticsDystopiaPoetryParticipant observationEpistemologySocial sciencePsychologyArtComputer sciencePolitical sciencePhilosophyLiteratureLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the linkages between Serres’ Le Parasite and the research practice of creative intervention via the analysis of an experimental film produced for the 2022 Space and Culture Conference on Taking Place and Making Place. The experimental film is intended as a provocation, in that it seeks to exceed the forms of conventional scholarship. In an effort to invent new modes of thought production, documented research materials of local sites are combined with a range of ideas and theories, blurring boundaries between theory, poetry, and practice, the dystopia of the virtualization of everyday life and the figuration of possible realities, glimpsed from a local viewpoint which follows the fluxes of emergences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.690
GPT teacher head0.656
Teacher spread0.035 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpace and CultureSame topicParticipatory Visual Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207