Cryosurgery and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Therapy for Treatment of Bowen's Disease and Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), which includes both Bowen's disease (BD) and superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC), is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada. BD and sBCC are amenable to minimally invasive treatments however, large-scale studies assessing long-term outcomes are lacking, particularly regarding the timing and duration of non-invasive combination treatments. OBJECTIVE: Examine the clinical cure rate of BD and sBCC using a combination treatment consisting of a single cycle of cryotherapy followed by a three to four-week course of topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: Retrospective chart review at a single center. Inclusion criteria included histology-proven sBCC or BD treated with either a combination protocol, cryosurgery, or 5-FU alone. RESULTS: 310 biopsy-confirmed cases of BD and 176 biopsy-confirmed cases of sBCC were analyzed. Of these, 229 cases of BD and 61 cases of sBCC were treated with cryosurgery and immediate 5-FU application, yielding a clearance rate of 90% and 86.9% at 6 months from initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Cryosurgery followed by immediate 5-FU use may be an effective mode of treatment for BD and sBCC, negating the need for invasive procedures and allowing for increased accessibility. Further studies with longer follow-up intervals, comparisons with other non-invasive treatments, and evidence of histologic cure are required. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1166-1171. doi:10.36849/JDD.7378.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".