Student Competition (Technology Innovation) ID 1970388
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background The evaluation of hand function after spinal cord injury (SCI) is conducted in clinical settings, which may not accurately reflect hand function in the real world, thereby limiting the efficacy assessment of new treatments. Wearable cameras, also known as egocentric video, are a novel method to evaluate hand function in non-clinical environments. Nonetheless, manual processing of vast quantities of complex video data is difficult, highlighting the need for automated data analysis. The objective of this study was to automatically identify distinct hand postures in egocentric video using unsupervised machine learning. Methods Seventeen participants with cervical SCI recorded activities of daily living in a home simulation laboratory. A hand pose estimation algorithm was applied on detected hands to determine 2D joint locations, which were lifted to 3D coordinates. The resulting hand posture information was subjected to a number of clustering techniques. Hand grasps were manually labelled into four categories for evaluation purposes: power, precision, intermediate, and non-prehensile. Results K-Means clustering consistently exhibited the highest Silhouette score, which reflects the presence of discrete clusters in the data. When comparing with manual annotations, Spectral Clustering applied to a feature space consisting of 2D pose estimation with confidence scores yield the best performance as quantified by maximum match (0.48), Fowlkes-Mallows score (0.46), and normalized mutual information (0.22). Conclusions This is the first attempt to develop an unsupervised, data-driven hand taxonomy for individuals with SCI using wearable technology. The findings suggest that the method is capable of grouping similar hand grasps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.884 | 0.791 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".