MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389402975 · doi:10.1504/ijmso.2023.135345

Pre-processing of RDF data for METIS partitioning

2023· article· en· W4389402975 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Siham Benhamed, Safia Nait Bahloul

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Metadata Semantics and Ontologies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisRDFComputer scienceLinked dataInformation retrievalWorld Wide WebSemantic Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The partitioning of RDF data on a large scale allows generating a set of RDF data subgraphs.METIS is a graph partitioning technique that minimises the cost of partitioning.METIS applies, among other things, to RDF graphs.However, the semantics introduced in the description of RDF data is not taken into account in the partitioning process in METIS.For this, we propose in this paper a step of pre-processing RDF data before partitioning these data.The objective of this step is to improve the quality of semantic partitioning of RDF graphs.The evaluation of the RDF pre-processing step for METIS was performed on real and synthetic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Metadata Semantics and OntologiesSame topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207