Disiplin Kerja, Komunikasi Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Ketahanan Pangan Dan Perikanan Kabupaten Buleleng
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studi ini berencana untuk mengetahui Disiplin Kerja, Komunikasi Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Ketahanan Pangan Dan Perikanan Kabupaten Buleleng. Strategi pemeriksaan informasi yang digunakan dalam eksplorasi ini adalah Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dengan melihat perbedaan SEM, yang dikenal dengan visual rendition 3.0 Partial Least Square (PLS). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengaruh disiplin kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja dengan nilai positif dan signifkan dimana nilai koefisiennya sebesar 0,305 dan nilai t statistik sebesar 2,549 dengan standar nilai t tabel yaitu 1,96, dengan tingkat signifikan 0,011 < 0,050. Pengaruh komunikasi terhadap kepuasan Kerja adalah positif signifikan dimana hasil 0,402 dengan nilai t-statistik yang lebih besar dari 1,96 yaitu 3,242 dan tingkat signifikan 0,001 < 0,050. Pengaruh lingkungan kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja adalah positif signifikan dimana hasil 0,252 dengan nilai t-statistik yang lebih besar dari 1,96 yaitu 2,156 dan tingkat signifikan 0,032 < 0,050.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".