MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389406948 · doi:10.1353/poe.2019.a741438

Poe's Profession / Dupin's Detection

2019· article· en· W4389406948 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Jones

Bibliographic record

VenuePoe Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrime and Detective Fiction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipAmerican literatureArgument (complex analysis)Art historyEmpireArtLiteratureHistoryClassicsPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poe's Profession / Dupin's Detection Paul C. Jones (bio) John Cullen Gruesser. Edgar Allan Poe and His Nineteenth-Century American Counterparts. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 184 pp. $100 cloth, $70 ebook. John Gruesser, the author and editor of numerous books, largely focused on the topics of African American literature and the genre of detective fiction, has produced his first book centered exclusively on Poe with the publication of Edgar Allan Poe and His Nineteenth-Century American Counterparts. In this volume, Gruesser gathers articles and book chapters written over the last decade (most of these have been published previously—in Poe Studies and the Edgar Allan Poe Review, in essay collections, and as chapters in his monograph Race, Gender and Empire in American Detective Fiction [Jefferson: McFarland, 2013]). While the book lacks a driving central argument that could serve as a satisfying and cohesive through-line for its chapters, the separate pieces collected here raise intriguing possibilities for understandings of Poe's connections to other American writers, his position in antebellum print culture, and his influence upon both his contemporaries and subsequent authors, especially those in the emerging detective genre, of which Poe has long been considered as an early practitioner, if not the actual inventor of the form. Gruesser's new book offers a solid contribution to the body of Poe scholarship—represented by studies like Meredith McGill's American Literature and the Culture of Reprinting, 1834–1853 (Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 2003) and Terence Whalen's Edgar Allan Poe and the Masses (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1999), and the essays collected in such volumes as The American Face of Edgar Allan Poe, edited by Shawn Rosenheim and Stephen Rachman (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1995) and Poe and the Remapping of Antebellum Print Culture, edited by J. Gerald Kennedy and Jerome McGann (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press, 2012)—that argues that our appreciation of Poe's texts is enriched by a broader awareness of the literary and cultural contexts in which they were produced. The trio of chapters clustered together as the first part of Gruesser's book, titled "The Quixotic Quest for Literary Fame, Financial Stability, and a Republic of Letters in Antebellum America," are connected by their focus on, according to Gruesser's introduction, "Poe's unrealized ambitions as a literary artist in the 1830s and 1840s" [5], but, more broadly, they explore different ways [End Page E23] that Poe was considered an outsider by his professional peers or felt himself to be marginalized from the publishing industry, as well as from other American institutions. The second chapter of this section, "Outside Looking In: Poe and New York City" (which recently appeared also in the collection Poe and Place (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018), is the strongest of the three as it explores through Poe's own writing his perception of this outsider status in a way that allows Gruesser to provide new insight into one of Poe's most-discussed tales, "The Cask of Amontillado." Using a selection of Poe's writings about the New York literary scene, including Doings in Gotham, The Literati of New York City, and his review of William Cullen Bryant, Gruesser explores the tensions revealed in Poe's descriptions of his contemporaries, as he sometimes "presents himself as an outsider looking in on New York" and at other times "writes about New York City for an outside, provincial audience … as a self-proclaimed insider" [22]. Much of Poe's critique of the literary establishment, of which he is a part but also feels excluded from, centers around the discrepancy between authors' popular reputations and the views of these authors held privately by editors, publishers, and fellow writers. This juxtaposition highlights the injustice of certain figures (like Longfellow) achieving popular success even while being judged as inferior or unoriginal, while others (like Hawthorne) might be well-respected by the establishment even though they do not find a large readership. Gruesser uses this context to turn to "Cask" as a reflection of Poe's resentment of these circumstances. Gruesser builds upon Joseph Schick's very convincing 1934 American Literature article that first considered "A Man Built in a Wall...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoe StudiesSame topicCrime and Detective Fiction StudiesFrench-language works237,207