Bibliographic record
Abstract
Museums are not only cultural venues; they also intend to reinforce the identity and image of the communities. This paper examines how the identifying role of the museum ‒ in this case the National Gallery of Canada in Ottawa ‒ has influenced the writing of the explanatory information to The Red Maple (1914), an oil painting by A. Y. Jackson. This explanatory note, whose presence is significant, emphasize the nationalist aspects of the picture, made by a founding member of the future Group of Seven at the beginning of World War I. However, this interpretation seems exaggerated. Even if the Group of Seven was intending to found a distinct Canadian art group and it is admitted that World War I marked for Canada an important phase of emancipation, nevertheless, there is no evidence that Jackson was at that time concerned by the war. Nor does he seem to have been in any way sensitive to the political dimension of Canadian participation in the conflict. It is most likely that the writing of the note has been influenced by the paper given to the Museum as a whole, i.e. a nationalist one, and attributed to the work an overestimated symbolic aspect. This shows how important it is that the discourse on art, when conveyed by a museum, strives to avoid as many intuitive elements as possible in order to concentrate on the work itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".