Insertive vaginal sex is associated with altered penile immunology and enrichment of <i>Gardnerella vaginalis</i> in uncircumcised Ugandan men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PROBLEM: HIV susceptibility is linked to the penile immune milieu (particularly IL-8 levels) and microbiome. The effects of insertive vaginal sex itself on penile immunology and microbiota are not well described. METHOD OF STUDY: We compared the immune milieu and microbiology of the coronal sulcus (CS) and distal urethra in 47 uncircumcised Ugandan men reporting ever (n = 42) or never (n = 5) having had vaginal intercourse. Soluble immune factors were assayed by multiplex ELISA, and penile bacteria abundance by 16S rRNA qPCR and sequencing. Co-primary endpoints were penile levels of IL-8 and soluble E-cadherin. RESULTS: Independent of classical STIs, men reporting prior vaginal sex demonstrated elevated IL-8 levels in both the coronal sulcus (1.78 vs. 0.81 log10 pg/mL, p = .021) and urethra (2.93 vs. 2.30 log10 pg/mL; p = .003), with a strong inverse relationship between urethral IL-8 levels and the time from last vaginal sex (r = -0.436; p = .004). Vaginal sex was also associated with elevated penile IL-1α/β and soluble E-cadherin (sEcad), a marker of epithelial disruption. Gardnerella vaginalis (Gv) was only present in the penile microbiome of men reporting prior vaginal sex, and urethral Gv absolute abundance was strongly associated with urethral inflammation (r = 0.556; p < .001); corynebacteria were enriched in the CS of men reporting no prior vaginal sex and were associated with reduced CS inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual intercourse was associated with sustained changes in penile immunology, potentially mediated through microbial alterations, in particular the urethral abundance of G. vaginalis. Future studies should further characterize the effects of sexual debut on penile bacteria and immunology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".