Neuropathie optique présumée secondaire à la consommation de cocaïne par voie nasale : rapport de cas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les effets secondaires oculaires de la consommation de cocaïne par voie nasale sont rares, mais peuvent comprendre des changements épithéliaux de la cornée, des complications vasculaires de la rétine et une inflammation orbitaire. Ce rapport décrit le cas d’une femme noire de 54 ans qui consommait de la cocaïne de façon régulière et qui s’est présentée avec une perte de vision aiguë et indolore de l’œil droit et un œdème de la papille optique droite. Les propriétés sympathomimétiques de la cocaïne peuvent mener à une neuropathie optique ; par conséquent, les antécédents d’un patient en matière de consommation de drogues à des fins récréatives ne doivent pas être écartés lorsqu’on examine des étiologies potentielles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.015 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".