CanStoc: A Hybrid Stochastic–GCM System for Monthly, Seasonal and Interannual Predictions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beyond their deterministic predictability limits of ≈10 days and 6 months, the atmosphere and ocean become effectively stochastic. This has led to the development of stochastic models specifically for this macroweather regime. A particularly promising approach is based on the Fractional Energy Balance Equation (FEBE), an update of the classical Budyko–Sellers energy balance approach. The FEBE has scaling symmetries that imply long memories, and these are exploited in the Stochastic Seasonal and Interannual Prediction System (StocSIPS). Whereas classical long-range forecast systems are initial value problems based on spatial information, StocSIPS is a past value problem based on (long) series at each pixel. We show how to combine StocSIPS with a classical coupled GCM system (CanSIPS) into a hybrid system (CanStoc), the skill of which is better than either. We show that for one-month lead times, CanStoc’s skill is particularly enhanced over either CanSIPS or StocSIPS, whereas for 2–3-month lead times, CanSIPS provides little extra skill. As expected, the CanStoc skill is higher over ocean than over land with some seasonal dependence. From the classical point of view, CanStoc could be regarded as a post-processing technique. From the stochastic point of view, CanStoc could be regarded as a way of harnessing extra skill at the submonthly scales in which StocSIPS is not expected to apply.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".