MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389449694 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09034-9_2

Model Based Clustering of Functional Data with Mild Outliers

2023· book-chapter· en· W4389449694 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutlierCluster analysisComputer scienceMultivariate statisticsData miningFunctional data analysisCURE data clustering algorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceCorrelation clusteringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We propose a procedure, called CFunHDDC, for clustering functional data with mild outliers which combines two existing clustering methods: the functional high dimensional data clustering (FunHDDC) [1] and the contaminated normal mixture (CNmixt) [3] method for multivariate data. We adapt the FunHDDC approach to data with mild outliers by considering a mixture of multivariate contaminated normal distributions. To fit the functional data in group-specific functional subspaces we extend the parsimonious models considered in FunHDDC, and we estimate the model parameters using an expectation-conditional maximization algorithm (ECM). The performance of the proposed method is illustrated for simulated and real-world functional data, and CFunHDDC outperforms FunHDDC when applied to functional data with outliers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.246
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it