Alteration of Lower Limb Kinematics and Kinetics due to Bilateral Triple Arthrodesis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed at discovering the existing differences in lower limb joints' kinematics, and EMG signals of 4 particular muscles of the ankle joint during gait, between normal subjects and patients with bilateral triple arthrodesis. Methods: In this research, a 3D motion analysis system was used and joints' angles were calculated using a MATLAB code, and based on the data collected from markers movements, for patients with bilateral triple arthrodesis and normal subjects. Moreover, the EMG signals of ankle muscles in each subject, and the graphs of mean plus and minus standard deviation of lower limb joint angles and muscles' EMG were calculated by MATLAB. Results: In all patients, an initial ankle eversion and valgus deformity were observed in their knee joints. In addition, for all patients, the maximum knee extension was less than that of the average value of the normal subjects. Furthermore, the results of the electromyography showed that, in all patients, delay occurred in gastrocnemius and soleus muscles in maximum contraction in their EMG signals. Besides, during the early stance phase of gait cycles, the mean value of EMG of peroneus brevis muscle for patients was more than that of normal subjects. Conclusion: Atrophy of four ankle muscles including (soleus, lateral gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior and peroneus brevis), also limitation of joints movement were observed in patients, compared to normal subjects. Based on the results of this work, in order to reduce further musculoskeletal disorders in patients who underwent bilateral triple arthrodesis surgery, there is a serious need to use physiotherapy after the surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".