PENGARUH DESAIN PRODUK, CITRA MEREK DAN GAYA HIDUP TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN SEPATU OLAHRAGA MEREK ADIDAS (Studi pada Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Satya Negara Indonesia)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the Influence of Product Design, Brand Image, and Lifestyle on the Purchasing Decision of Adidas brand sports shoes on Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Satya Negara University Indonesia. The data used is primary data collected through the distribution of questionnaires to 110 students who use Adidas brand sports shoes. The method used in this study used quantitative methods with causal design and research results based on respondents' answers using the Likert scale. The data analysis methods used in this study are the Multiple Linear Regression Test, F Test, t Test, and Coefficient of Determination.The results of this study show that simultaneously (test F) Product Design, Brand Image, and Lifestyle affect Purchasing Decisions. Partially (test t) Product Design does not affect the Purchase Decision, Brand Image affects the Purchase Decision, and Lifestyle affects the Purchase Decision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".