MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389459373 · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2023.3340619

RL-PGO: Reinforcement Learning-Based Planar Pose-Graph Optimization

2023· article· en· W4389459373 on OpenAlexaff
Nikolaos Kourtzanidis, Sajad Saeedi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Control Systems Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningSolverMarkov decision processComputer scienceGraphArtificial intelligenceObservableMathematical optimizationPartially observable Markov decision processNonlinear systemMachine learningAlgorithmMarkov chainTheoretical computer scienceMarkov processMathematicsMarkov model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we present to the best of our knowledge, the first deep reinforcement learning (DRL) based 2D pose-graph optimization (PGO). We demonstrate that the pose-graph optimization problem can be modeled as a partially observable Markov Decision Process. The proposed agent outperforms state-of-the-art solver g2o on challenging instances where traditional nonlinear least-squares techniques may fail or converge to unsatisfactory solutions. Experimental results indicate that iterative-based solvers bootstrapped with the proposed approach allow for significantly higher quality estimations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Control Systems LettersSame topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207