Le problème identitaire dans le Canada francophone littéraire dans la deuxième moitié du XX-ème siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the case of one of the greatest Canadian francophone writers, Réjean Ducharme, ethnic assimilation is not made within the terms of a virtual contract; Ducharmean heroes try to integrate individually, deprived of the strong advantage of the mutual understanding and non-combat between the citizens of a cosmopolitan city in the second half of the 20th century. They make attempts to be accepted in their life and work environment, by playing the originality card, that of their profound lack of interest concerning material and promotion ambition. They fail, one by one, in a very tragic way and the consequence is that they suffer a dramatic transformation : either they choose to become famous members of society, by imitating its habits and deciding it is their turn to « swallow » (a keyword in Ducharmean novels) the weak and the misfit or they isolate themselves and don’t respond anymore to social and family calls . Thus, in Ducharme’s novels, the family microcosm and the social macrocosm mirror, by an intricate reflection game, the Canadian - French issue. In the heart of the conflict lies the ethnic antagonism which underlines the social confusion, as, unlike the United-States, there is not a single, but two national models; as a result of this opposition, morbid anxiety, murder impulses, neurosis are part of the characters’ natural behaviour; we literally witness the complex of a society. In spite all that, under the light of Canadian political and diplomatic initiatives during the last decades, pessimism and extreme solutions seem to have been replaced by a more responsible approach. Relations between the two communities, Anglophone and Francophone, are no longer dealt with in terms of destructive battle: a peaceful autonomy is being negotiated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.040 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".