MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389469222 · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2023.113932

An AI approach to operationalise global daily PlanetScope satellite imagery for river water masking

2023· article· en· W4389469222 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel Valman, Doreen S. Boyd, Patrice Carbonneau, Matthew F. Johnson, Stephen J. Dugdale

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing of Environment · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsRemote sensingComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkEnvironmental scienceSatellite imageryBiomeArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceEcosystemGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring rivers is vital to manage the invaluable ecosystem services they provide, and also to mitigate the risks they pose to property and life through flooding and drought. Due to the vast extent and dynamic nature of river systems, Earth Observation (EO) is one of the best ways to measure river characteristics. As a first step, EO-based river monitoring often requires extraction of accurate pixel-level water masks, but satellite images traditionally used for this purpose suffer from limited spatial and/or temporal resolution. We address this problem by applying a novel Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based model to automate water mask extraction from daily 3 m resolution PlanetScope satellite imagery. Notably, this approach overcomes radiometric issues that frequently present limitations when working with CubeSat data. We test our classification model on 36 rivers across 12 global terrestrial biomes (as proxies for the environmental and physical characteristics that lead to the variability in catchments around the globe). Using a relatively shallow CNN classification model, our approach produced a median F1 accuracy score of 0.93, suggesting that a compact and efficient CNN-based model can work as well as, if not better than, the very deep neural networks conventionally used in similar studies, whilst requiring less training data and computational power. We further show that our model, specialised to the task at hand, performs better than a state-of-the-art Fully Convolutional Neural Network (FCN) that struggles with the highly variable image quality from PlanetScope. Although classifying rivers that were narrower than 60 m, anastomosed or highly urbanised was slightly less successful than our other test images, we showed that fine tuning could circumvent these limitations to some degree. Indeed, fine tuning carried out on the Ottawa River, Canada, by including just 5 additional site-specific training images significantly improved classification accuracy (F1 increased from 0.81 to 0.90, p < 0.01). Overall, our results show that CNN-based classification applied to PlanetScope imagery is a viable tool for producing accurate, temporally dynamic river water masks, opening up possibilities for river monitoring investigations where high temporal variability data is essential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote Sensing of EnvironmentSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207