MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Learned Point Cloud Compression for Classification

2023· article· en· W4389474387 on OpenAlexaff
Mateen Ulhaq, Ivan V. Bajić

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodecComputer sciencePoint cloudEncoderCloud computingArtificial intelligenceData compressionReduction (mathematics)SegmentationReal-time computingComputer hardwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning is increasingly being used to perform machine vision tasks such as classification, object detection, and segmentation on 3D point cloud data. However, deep learning inference is computationally expensive. The limited computational capabilities of end devices thus necessitate a codec for transmitting point cloud data over the network for server-side processing. Such a codec must be lightweight and capable of achieving high compression ratios without sacrificing accuracy. Motivated by this, we present a novel point cloud codec that is highly specialized for the machine task of classification. Our codec, based on PointNet, achieves a significantly better rate-accuracy trade-off in comparison to alternative methods. In particular, it achieves a 94% reduction in BD-bitrate over non-specialized codecs on the ModelNet40 dataset. For low-resource end devices, we also propose two lightweight configurations of our encoder that achieve similar BD-bitrate reductions of 93% and 92% with 3% and 5% drops in top-1 accuracy, while consuming only 0.470 and 0.048 encoder-side kMACs/point, respectively. Our codec demonstrates the potential of specialized codecs for machine analysis of point clouds, and provides a basis for extension to more complex tasks and datasets in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207