Modeling Biodegradable Free Chlorine Sensor Performance Using Artificial Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Electrochemical sensors are used to measure target analytes in water, meat, fruits, or vegetables, to ensure their safety, security, and integrity for human use. In this paper, a solution‐based fabrication process is presented for a biodegradable electrochemical free chlorine sensor using asparagine that is functionalized onto graphene oxide (GO). An ink solution of the GO functionalized with asparagine is synthesized, and then deposited onto a screen‐printed carbon electrode (SPCE) using a spin coater. The sensor shows high a sensitivity of 0.30 µA ppm−1 over a linear range of 0–8 ppm with a hysteresis‐limited resolution of 0.2 ppm after achieving a steady state at 50 s. From the development and testing of the free chlorine sensor, over 9000 datapoints are collected and used for training an artificial neural network (ANN) model to quantify and characterize the factors affecting the free chlorine sensor's performance, and model its degradation characteristics. The model reports a low mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.1603 and a high model accuracy with a Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of 0.9950, demonstrating that these degradation characteristics can be modeled and be used to compensate the degraded performance characteristics of the free chlorine sensors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".