Un voisinage grandement préjudiciable: le colonialisme municipal et les habitants à l’assaut des réserves autochtones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir des années 1840, la création des municipalités chargées de l’aménagement du territoire et de la voirie dans le Bas-Canada a ouvert un espace politique permettant aux habitants d’exprimer leurs préoccupations quotidiennes et locales. L’étude du colonialisme municipal offre un cadre d’analyse qui permet de recentrer notre compréhension des rapports historiques entre Québécois et Autochtones dans la seconde moitié du 19e siècle. À la fois espace politique et lieu de construction identitaire, la municipalité a permis aux habitants désirant s’approprier les ressources et les terres de leurs voisins autochtones de déguiser leur convoitise sous le voile du bien public et de l’intérêt national. Ce faisant, ils ont construit et véhiculé des représentations stéréotypées des Autochtones comme des individus « sauvages », nomades, antimoderne, et par nature inadaptés à la vie « civilisée » des villes et des villages de la province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".