MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389478899 · doi:10.2196/53063

Analgesic Effect of Intraoperative Intravenous S(+)-Ketamine During Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2023· article· en· W4389478899 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. Deng, L Chen, Xiao Song, Liang Guo, Fei Zhao, Jing Liu, Ling Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShandong First Medical University
KeywordsMedicineKetamineAnalgesicAnesthesiaPlaceboRandomized controlled trialAdverse effectArthroplastyOpioidPatient satisfactionRehabilitationClinical trialPhysical therapySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is currently the main treatment for end-stage knee disease. The number of cases of TKA in China increased from 53,880 in 2011 to 374,833 in 2019, representing a 5.9-fold increase. Moderate to severe pain often occurs after TKA, which seriously affects postoperative rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and overall outcome. Multimodal analgesia is considered the ideal solution. Adequate postoperative analgesia can not only reduce pain, opioid consumption, and, consequently, opioid-related adverse events, but can also reduce the length of hospital stay and costs and improve rehabilitation and patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: Effective multimodal pain management in the early postoperative period is essential for anesthesiologists. Additional studies have demonstrated that a low-dose intravenous infusion of ketamine can be administered as an adjuvant drug to alleviate acute postoperative pain. Therefore, we aim to appraise the efficacy and safety of intraoperative intravenous injection of S(+)-ketamine to relieve acute pain after TKA in older patients. METHODS: This is a protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 144 participants aged 65 years and older undergoing TKA will be randomly allocated into the S(+)-ketamine and placebo groups in a 1:1 ratio. S(+)-ketamine or the placebo will be intravenously administered at 0.3 mg/kg/h during the operation by anesthesiologists. Blinded evaluation by trained investigators will be completed at 2 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery. The primary outcome measure will be the numeric rating scale score at rest and movement at 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes will include the numeric rating scale scores at rest and movement at 2 hours and 48 hours after surgery, the number of patients who require additional analgesics during the first 48 hours after operation, the total consumption of opioids or nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs during the first 48 hours after operation, and adverse events at 2, 24, and 48 hours after operation. RESULTS: The protocol was registered at Clinical Trials.gov on February 26, 2022. It was performed in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations of the participating institutions. Recruitment began in April 2022. Data collection is expected to conclude in September 2024. Study completion is expected in December 2024. CONCLUSIONS: A randomized, controlled, clinical study was designed to observe the analgesic effect of intraoperative intravenous administration of a lower dose of S(+)-ketamine (0.3 mg/kg/h) in older patients after TKA surgery. The protocol will appraise the efficacy and safety of intraoperative intravenous injection of S(+)-ketamine to relieve acute pain after TKA in older patients who may benefit from the administration of S(+)-ketamine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05289050; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05289050. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/53063.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.576
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207