MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389484081 · doi:10.24908/ss.v21i4.16873

Review of Lindau’s Surveillance and the Vanishing Individual: Power and Privacy in the Digital Age

2023· article· en· W4389484081 on OpenAlexaff
Samantha McAleese

Bibliographic record

VenueSurveillance & Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPopulism, Right-Wing Movements
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)Internet privacyComputer scienceComputer securityPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surveillance and the Vanishing Individual: Power and Privacy in the Digital Age (2022) offers a comprehensive analysis of the growing creep of state and corporate surveillance.For those who are new to surveillance scholarship, perhaps drawn to this space due to personal concerns about privacy and technology, Juan D. Lindau provides language, theory, and evidence to validate anxieties and push back against the notion that all innovation is good innovation.This book is grounded in an understanding that infringement on our private lives has become the norm in the name of safety and security, along with reminders that nothing is free (or done with benevolence) under surveillance capitalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurveillance & SocietySame topicPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsFrench-language works237,207