MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389488690 · doi:10.1128/mbio.02192-23

Localization and tissue tropism of the symbiont <i>Microsporidia MB</i> in the germ line and somatic tissues of <i>Anopheles arabiensis</i>

2023· article· en· W4389488690 on OpenAlexaff
Edward Edmond Makhulu, Thomas Ogao Onchuru, Joseph Gichuhi, Fidel Gabriel Otieno, Anne W. Wairimu, Joseph N. Muthoni, Lizette L. Koekemoer, Jeremy K. Herren

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersAustralian Centre for International Agricultural ResearchDirektion für Entwicklung und ZusammenarbeitDirektoratet for UtviklingssamarbeidOpen Philanthropy ProjectChildren's Investment Fund FoundationStyrelsen för Internationellt UtvecklingssamarbeteGovernment of the Republic of KenyaBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsMicrosporidiaSomatic cellTropismGermlineBiologyTissue tropismVirologyGeneticsMicrobiologyVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The Anopheles symbiont, Microsporidia MB , is maternally inherited and has a strong malaria transmission-blocking phenotype in Anopheles arabiensis. Microsporidia MB is also vertically transmitted, sexually transmitted, and avirulent. These characteristics are expected to promote its spread through mosquito populations, enhancing the potential of Microsporidia MB as a candidate for the development of a symbiont-mediated malaria transmission-blocking strategy. We found that the patterns of Microsporidia MB localization over the development of An. arabiensis indicate accumulation in tissues linked to its transmission, specifically the male and female gonadal tissues. Transovarial vertical transmission of Microsporidia MB occurs in the female An. arabiensis ovary when Microsporidia MB becomes localized to the cytoplasm of the developing oocyte. In male An. arabiensis , Microsporidia MB is localized in the testis and vas deferens. Notably, a high intensity of Microsporidia MB can also be observed in the An. arabiensis adult but not larval gut. The levels of Microsporidia MB found in the female ovary are linked to the progression of oogenesis, increasing after blood feeding initiates the development of eggs. There was a significant change in Microsporidia MB levels in female and male An. arabiensis gonads, where intensity tended to decrease as mosquitoes aged. However, the intensities did not significantly change in the male or female guts. Altogether, the high specificity of Microsporidia MB tissue localization patterns and changes in infection prevalence and intensity suggest adaptation to maximize transmission and avirulence in Anopheles arabiensis . IMPORTANCE Microsporidia MB is a symbiont with a strong malaria transmission-blocking phenotype in Anopheles arabiensis . It spreads in mosquito populations through mother-to-offspring and sexual transmission. The ability of Microsporidia MB to block Plasmodium transmission, together with its ability to spread within Anopheles populations and its avirulence to the host, makes it a very attractive candidate for developing a key strategy to stop malaria transmissions. Here, we report tissue tropism and localization patterns of Microsporidia MB , which are relevant to its transmission. We find that Microsporidia MB accumulates in Anopheles arabiensis tissues, linked to its sexual and vertical transmission. Its prevalence and intensity in the tissues over the mosquito life cycle suggest adaptation to maximize transmission and avirulence in Anopheles arabiensis . These findings provide the foundation for understanding the factors that may affect Microsporidia MB transmission efficiency. This will contribute to the development of strategies to maximize Microsporidia MB transmission to establish and sustain a high prevalence of the symbiont in Anopheles mosquito populations for malaria transmission blocking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicInsect symbiosis and bacterial influencesFrench-language works237,207