MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389493132 · doi:10.5771/9783748917359

Der Rückgang der Eingangszahlen bei den Zivilgerichten

2023· book· en· W4389493132 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Caroline Meller-Hannich, Stefan Ekert, Monika Nöhre, Armin Höland, Katharina Gelbrich, Lisa Poel, Lukas Hundertmark, Adrian Moser

Bibliographic record

VenueNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDispute Resolution and Class Actions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConciliationFellPolitical scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)Economic JusticeLawChristian ministryPeriod (music)GeographyCartographyArbitrationArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The number of civil lawsuits filed in Germany has been declining significantly for more than 20 years. In the period from 2005 to 2019, they fell by around one-third at the local courts and regional courts. If we refer to the period from 1995 to 2019, the number of incoming cases at the local courts has actually almost halved and at the regional courts it has fallen by around a quarter. A well-founded explanation for this development has been lacking until now. In a research project for the Federal Ministry of Justice, the authors of this book evaluated statistics and conducted extensive primary surveys among the judiciary and the legal profession, the general public and companies, as well as conciliation bodies and legal expenses insurers. The results of the interdisciplinary project, which ran for more than 30 months, are contained in this volume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooksSame topicDispute Resolution and Class ActionsFrench-language works237,207