MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389493957 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202329002009

Study of (p,2p) fission reactions in inverse kinematics using the R3B set-up

2023· article· en· W4389493957 on OpenAlexaff
G. García-Jiménez, H. Álvarez-Pol, A. Graña-González, J. L. Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. Benlliure, D. Cortina‐Gil, L. Atar, L. Audouin, G. Authelet, A. Besteiro, G. Blanchon, K. Boretzky, M. J. G. Borge, P. Cabanelas, E. Casarejos, J. Cederkall, A. Chatillon, A. Corsi, Miguel Ángel Álvarez Feijoo, E. De Filippo, D. Galaviz, I. Gašparić, E. Geraci, R. Gernhäuser, B. Gnoffo, M. Heil, A. Heinz, T. Hensel, M. Holl, D. Jelavić Malenica, T. Jenegger, L. Ji, H. Johansson, O.A. Kiselev, P. Klenze, A. Knyazev, D. Körper, T. Kröll, I. Lithar, Yu. A. Litvinov, B. Löher, N. S. Martorana, P. Morfouace, D. Mücher, S. Murillo-Morales, A. Obertelli, V. Panin, J. Park, S. Paschalis, Á. Perea, M. Petri, S. Pirrone, L. Ponnath, A. Revel, H. B. Rhee, L. Rose, D. Rossi, P. Russotto, H. Simon, A. Stott, Y. Sun, C. Sürder, Julien Taı̈eb, R. Taniuchi, O. Tengblad, H. Törnqvist, M. Trimarchì, S. Velardita, J. Vesic, B. Voss

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersXunta de GaliciaInstitute for Basic Science
KeywordsFissionContext (archaeology)Nuclear physicsPhysicsKinematicsInverseInverse kinematicsCalorimeter (particle physics)Nuclear fissionNeutronDetectorMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new experimental fission approach is presented in the context of the R3B (Reactions with Relativistic Radioactive Beams) collaboration, at the GSI/FAIR facility, in which knockout reactions in inverse kinematics are used to induce fission of 238U that will allow to characterise the excitation energy of the fission process and all the fission products. The CALIFA (CALorimeter for In-Flight detection of γ-rays and high energy charged pArticles) calorimeter, a key part of the R3B set-up, is used to reconstruct the momenta of the two protons from the (p, 2p) reactions. Preliminary results show that kinematic variables and first estimates for nucleon-removal cross sections are well reconstructed and in good agreement with other experimental measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207