Proactive and Intelligent Monitoring and Orchestration of Cloud-Native IP Multimedia Subsystem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the cloud moves from monolithic infrastructure to a self-isolated cloud native microservice environment, automation is becoming an important aspect for the management of the application life cycle. In this context, there are many tools available that can monitor these applications and raise alarms. However, automated orchestration is still in its early stages, and the available solutions are not capable of monitoring the whole system from application to hardware levels and performing automated operations within the system. Moreover, IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS), which is the core part of the Telecom industry, has switched to a microservice environment. These IMS services are critical and need to be proactively monitored to provide automated orchestration operations. In this paper, we address the aforementioned problem by proposing a new scheme for monitoring the metrics from different sources and proactively and automatically performing orchestration using machine learning while improving the scalability of the cloud native Virtual IMS. Experiments carried out with a real cloud-native IMS running in a kubernetes cluster explore the relevance, efficiency and scalability of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it