MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389505098 · doi:10.22316/poc/08.2.02

Coaching from a Place of Grounded Uncertainty: Richard Rorty’s Neo- Pragmatism and the ICF’s Core Competency Model

2023· article· en· W4389505098 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Julian Humphreys

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophy of Coaching An International Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPragmatism in Philosophy and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPragmatismCoachingGrounded theoryCore (optical fiber)Core competencyEpistemologyPsychologySociologyPedagogyManagementPhilosophyPsychotherapistSocial scienceEngineeringQualitative researchEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ICF's Core Competency model defines coaching behaviorally but does not offer a coherent philosophy of coaching.In this paper, I argue that a philosophy of coaching is useful for coaches as it allows them to go beyond simply 'behaving' as a coach to being actively grounded as a coach.I then present Richard Rorty's neo-pragmatism as a philosophy that aligns with the ICF's core competency model and argue that an understanding of neo-pragmatism is useful to coaches as it allows them to coach from a place of 'grounded uncertainty'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophy of Coaching An International JournalSame topicPragmatism in Philosophy and EducationFrench-language works237,207