Non-Interactive DSSE for Medical Data Sharing With Forward and Backward Privacy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In medical cloud computing, more medical data owners are preferred to outsource their sensitive data to the cloud after encryption. Meanwhile, dynamic searchable symmetric encryption (DSSE) provides the capability for data users to query over the dynamically-updated encrypted database. To reduce update leakage, a secure DSSE scheme usually requires forward and backward privacy. However, existing multi-client DSSE schemes with forward and backward privacy require the data owner to keep online to respond to per-query interaction from data users. To address this issue, we propose a multi-client non-interactive DSSE scheme with forward and backward privacy, namely MCNI. The core design of MCNI is leveraging time range queries to achieve non-interactive forward privacy since the past queries cannot be used to search the newly-added timestamps. To enable efficient time range queries, we convert the timestamp and time range into the boolean wildcard form and develop Boolean Wildcard Matching (BWM) algorithm that formulates the match as a dot product calculation problem. Finally, we combine the polynomial fitting technique, time range query, and random matrix multiplication technique to achieve efficient keyword searches without revealing sensitive information. Theoretical analysis and extensive experiments demonstrate the security and effectiveness of our proposed scheme, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".