Arabic Fine-Grained Entity Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional NER systems are typically trained to recognize coarse-grained categories of entities, and less attention is given to classifying entities into a hierarchy of fine-grained lower-level sub-types. This article aims to advance Arabic NER with fine-grained entities. We chose to extend Wojood (an open-source Nested Arabic Named Entity Corpus) with sub-types. In particular, four main entity types in Wojood (geopolitical entity (GPE), location (LOC), organization (ORG), and facility (FAC) are extended with 31 sub-types of entities. To do this, we first revised Wojood’s annotations of GPE, LOC, ORG, and FAC to be compatible with the LDC’s ACE guidelines, which yielded 5, 614 changes. Second, all mentions of GPE, LOC, ORG, and FAC (~ 44K) in Wojood are manually annotated with the LDC’s ACE subtypes. This extended version of Wojood is called WojoodFine. To evaluate our annotations, we measured the inter-annotator agreement (IAA) using both Cohen’s Kappa and F1 score, resulting in 0.9861 and 0.9889, respectively. To compute the baselines of WojoodFine, we fine-tune three pre-trained Arabic BERT encoders in three settings: flat NER, nested NER and nested NER with sub-types and achieved F1 score of 0.920, 0.866, and 0.885, respectively. Our corpus and models are open source and available at https://sina.birzeit.edu/wojood/.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".