Semantics Squad at BLP-2023 Task 1: Violence Inciting Bangla Text Detection with Fine-Tuned Transformer-Based Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the application of Transformer-based models for violence threat identification.We participated in the BLP-2023 Shared Task 1 and in our initial submission, BanglaBERT large achieved 5 th position on the leader-board with a macro F1 score of 0.7441, approaching the highest baseline of 0.7879 established for this task.In contrast, the top-performing system on the leaderboard achieved an F1 score of 0.7604.Subsequent experiments involving m-BERT, XLM-RoBERTa base, XLM-RoBERTa large, BanglishBERT, BanglaBERT, and BanglaBERT large models revealed that BanglaBERT achieved an F1 score of 0.7441, which closely approximated the baseline.Remarkably, m-BERT and XLM-RoBERTa base also approximated the baseline with macro F1 scores of 0.6584 and 0.6968, respectively.A notable finding from our study is the under-performance by larger models for the shared task dataset, which requires further investigation.Our findings underscore the potential of transformer-based models in identifying violence threats, offering valuable insights to enhance safety measures on online platforms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".