AmeriFlux FLUXNET-1F CA-Ca2 British Columbia - Clearcut Douglas-fir stand (harvested winter 1999/2000)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the AmeriFlux Management Project (AMP) created FLUXNET-1F version of the carbon flux data for the site CA-Ca2 British Columbia - Clearcut Douglas-fir stand (harvested winter 1999/2000). This is the FLUXNET version of the carbon flux data for the site CA-Ca2 British Columbia - Clearcut Douglas-fir stand (harvested winter 1999/2000) produced by applying the standard ONEFlux (1F) software. Site Description - Tower Type: 10" triangular tower; Latitude/Longitude 49.87048N -125.29087W (GPS survey, 2003. Coordinates updated/corrected May, 2006); Elevation approx. 180m; Mean Air Temp. (for the growing season) 8.3 C*; Mean Annual Precipitation 1461 mm *; Date Operations Began August 2000; Frequency of EC Measurements 7.7 Hz (2000 2001), 20 Hz (2002); Frequency of Other Met. Sensors 4 sec, year round; Soil Respiration Measurements Periodically during growing season using portable system in 2002; * 1998-2001 averages from the 1948 Douglas-fir stand meteorological tower
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".