Composite Biomarker Image for Advanced Visualization in Histopathology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) biomarkers are essential tools for reliable cancer diagnosis and subtyping. It requires cross-staining comparison among Whole Slide Images (WSIs) of IHCs and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides. Currently, pathologists examine the visually co-localized areas across IHC and H&E glass slides for a final diagnosis, which is a tedious and challenging task. Moreover, visually inspecting different IHC slides back and forth to analyze local co-expressions is inherently subjective and prone to error, even when carried out by experienced pathologists. Relying on digital pathology, we propose "Composite Biomarker Image" (CBI) in this work. CBI is a single image that can be composed using different filtered IHC biomarker images for better visualization. We present a CBI image produced in two steps by the proposed solution for better visualization and hence more efficient clinical workflow. In the first step, IHC biomarker images are aligned with the H&E images using one coordinate system and orientation. In the second step, the positive or negative IHC regions from each biomarker image (based on the pathologists' recommendation) are filtered and combined into one image using a fuzzy inference system. For evaluation, the resulting CBI images, from the proposed system, were evaluated qualitatively by the expert pathologists. The CBI concept helps the pathologists to identify the suspected target tissues more easily, which could be further assessed by examining the actual WSIs at the same suspected regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".