Non-invasive estimation of arterial blood pressure fluctuations using a peripheral photoplethysmograph inside the MRI scanner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is modulated by neural activity through the neurovascular coupling effect, as well as non-neural factors of physiological origin such as heart rate, respiration, and arterial blood pressure (ABP). While the former two effects have been previously characterized, the modulation of the BOLD signal by ABP fluctuations is still poorly understood. This is largely due to the difficulty of obtaining reliable ABP measurements in the MRI environment. Here, we propose a combined experimental and mathematical modeling framework to estimate ABP fluctuations inside the MRI scanner using photoplethysmography (PPG). Specifically, we used concurrent PPG and ABP measurements obtained outside the scanner to train the mathematical model and applied it to PPG measurements obtained inside the MRI scanner. Our results suggest good agreement between the model-predicted and experimentally measured ABP fluctuations and region specific correlations with the BOLD fluctuations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".