Cloud Native Remote Monitoring Data Ecosystem for Aging Population based on Commercial AAL Sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the recent years, Active Assisted Living (AAL) technologies used for autonomous tracking and activity recognition have started to play major roles in geriatric care. From fall detection to remotely monitoring behavioral patterns, vital functions and collection of air quality data, AAL has become pervasive in the modern era of independent living for the elderly section of the population. However, even with the current rate of progress, data access and data reliability has become a major hurdle especially when such data is intended to be used in new age modelling approaches such as those using machine learning. This paper presents a comprehensive data ecosystem comprising remote monitoring AAL sensors along with extensive focus on cloud native system architecture, secured and confidential access to data with easy data sharing. Results from a validation study illustrate the feasibility of using this system for remote healthcare surveillance. The proposed system shows great promise in multiple fields from various AAL studies to development of data driven policies by local governments in promoting healthy lifestyles for the elderly alongside a common data repository that can be beneficial to other research communities worldwide.Clinical Relevance- This study creates a cloud-based smart home data ecosystem, which can achieve the remote healthcare monitoring for aging population, enabling them to live more independently and decreasing hospital admission rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".