MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389540308 · doi:10.29007/drsl

Mathematics and Science Subjects in Construction Management Baccalaureate Programs

2023· article· en· W4389540308 on OpenAlexaff
Jishnu Subedi

Bibliographic record

VenueEPiC series in built environment · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsSAIT Polytechnic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccreditationBachelorMathematics educationScience and engineeringMedical educationMathematicsComputer scienceEngineering managementEngineeringPolitical scienceEngineering ethicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study analyzes credit-hours of mathematics and science subjects in the American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) accredited bachelor’s degree programs in Construction Management (CM). As per the current ACCE standards, a graduate of a CM program is required to complete 3 and 6 Semester Hours (SHs) in Mathematics and Science, respectively. An analysis of the credit-hours in the 75 accredited programs shows that more than 90 percent of the programs require a student to complete more hours in these subject than the required 9 SHs. The analysis also shows that 72 percent of the programs require 6 SHs or more in Mathematics and 79 percent of the programs require 8 SHs or more in Science. A strong presence of mathematics and science subjects in the CM programs indicates that the programs are striving to equip the graduates with skills in data analysis, model building, and research and innovation. Moreover, these subjects equip the graduates for a continuous academic inquiry and prepare them to understand and appreciate the natural world. The results indicate that the CM programs make a strong case for science, technology, engineering, and math designation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPiC series in built environmentSame topicEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207