MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389540788 · doi:10.17118/11143/21092

Reinforcement learning based dynamic path following of an industrialrobot

2023· article· en· W4389540788 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Zhou, Jianyu Tang, Tingting Shu, Wenfang Xie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElevator Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer sciencePath (computing)ReinforcementRobotRobot learningMobile robotArtificial intelligenceEngineeringStructural engineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enhancing industrial robot path following accuracy requires the real-time feedback of an external sensor.This study introduces a position-based visual servoing (PBVS) scheme to decrease path error by correcting the Cartesian pose in real-time.The vision system estimates the end effector pose from which the Cartesian pose offset is calculated.The robot's internal control system treats the pose offset as a high-level control input and induces real-time modification of the robot's intrinsic motion.A proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller is utilized as the baseline control method.Due to the repetitiveness of robot tasks, the control performance undergoes iterative improvement via the supplementation of a reinforcement learning(RL)-based controller trained via a state-of-the-art actor-critic algorithm.The experimental platform comprises two commercial systems: the C-Track 780 dual camera sensor from Creaform and the M-20iA robot from FANUC.In a position-only line following experiment, the effect of RL-based controller supplementation significantly enhances path accuracy by attenuating overshoot.The mean absolute error (MAE) and the maximum error are reduced by 10% and 20%, respectively.In terms of the Euclidean norm, the maximum path error is 0.09 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElevator Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207