MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389540792 · doi:10.17118/11143/21170

Hydrogen as an alternate fuel for class 8 heavy-duty trucks : a casestudy

2023· article· en· W4389540792 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Mohammadi, Ofelia A. Jianu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckHeavy dutyHydrogenClass (philosophy)Environmental scienceDutyAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringChemistryPolitical scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considering the enormous environmental effects of the harmful carbon dioxide emissions due to human activities on global warming, it is necessary to find more sustainable sources of energy.Transportation sector is a substantial source of CO2 emissions, consuming about one third of the overall energy production.Thus, it is vital to find alternate fuels which could significantly mitigate the detrimental greenhouse gas emissions from transportation sector.Hydrogen, as a potential clean fuel, can significantly lower hazardous greenhouse gas emissions released by vehicles, specifically in heavy-duty applications.In order to assess the possibility of the transitioning from internal combustion vehicles to fully hydrogen-based trucks, it is crucial to conduct a thorough investigation of CO2 emission levels as well as the hydrogen cost delivered to refueling stations.Current study examines the practicality of replacing a certain number of heavy-duty trucks by their hydrogen counterparts across important Highway 401 using an analytical approach in which various hydrogen truck adaptation rates including conservative, probable and ambitious scenarios have been taken into consideration.Moreover, this research provides an estimation of the required network of hydrogen refueling stations utilizing a techno-economic analysis.The amount of CO2 emissions prevented from entering the atmosphere by replacing hydrogen trucks have been calculated for each case scenario.Findings indicate that the most ambitious case study prevents almost 44000 tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere by year 2030.This has an equal impact as removing 9,362 typical gasoline passenger vehicles from the road.Moreover, the most ambitious scenario leads to a carbon abatement cost of about 1,825,000 CAD by 2030.Also, the results delineate that about 62,000 tons compressed hydrogen will be required to be distributed along the Highway 401 to meet the demands of the hydrogen trucks fleet.Estimations of the hydrogen price for different hydrogen generation methods have been taken into consideration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207