MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389540930 · doi:10.17118/11143/20981

Effect of spacing ratio on unsteady flow characteristics of tandem andside-by-side circular cylinders in cross-flow during self-excited acousticresonance

2023· article· en· W4389540930 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Alziadeh, Atef Mohany

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow (mathematics)Resonance (particle physics)Excited stateMaterials scienceTandemMechanicsAcousticsPhysicsAtomic physicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circular cylinders are commonly used in various industrial applications such as civil structures, marine pipelines, antennae, energy harvesting systems, and heat exchangers.When the Reynolds number is high enough, periodic vortex structures known as vortex shedding form in the wake of the cylinders.This phenomenon induces fluctuating forces at the vortex shedding frequency due to its oscillatory nature.In enclosed systems like heat exchangers, if the vortex shedding frequency is close to the frequency of an acoustic resonant mode, acoustic resonance may occur if the flow energy is sufficient to overcome the acoustic damping capacity.This can lead to the initiation of self-excited acoustic resonance.During self-excited acoustic resonance, a feedback mechanism is initiated where the vortex shedding process acts as an aeroacoustic sound source, which excites an acoustic standing wave, and in-turn improves the vortex shedding process.During self-excited acoustic resonance, severe tonal noise is generated, potentially reaching sound levels of 175 dB in heat exchanger tube bundles.These noise levels can cause excessive vibrations in surrounding equipment, disrupt operation, and create hazardous work environments for nearby workers.The intricate nature of the flow-acoustic coupling in heat exchanger tube bundles can only be understood if the flow-sound interaction mechanisms from cylinders in different arrangement, such as tandem and side-by-side cylinders, is investigated.Thus, this study aims to provide a better understanding of the effect of the center-to-center longitudinal (L/D) and transverse (T/D) spacing ratio between circular cylinders in tandem and side-by-side arrangements on the unsteady flow characteristics and how they change when self-excited acoustic resonance is triggered.The study focuses on longitudinal spacing ratios (L/D) ranging from 1.5 to 4.5 for tandem cylinders, and transverse spacing ratios (T/D) ranging from 1.2 to 5 for side-by-side cylinders, as these ratios correspond to different flow regimes found in these arrangements.Acoustic pressure measurements are employed to analyze the aeroacoustic response of the cylinders.Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) is utilized to visualize the flow field before self-excited acoustic resonance, while Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) analysis is used to capture the periodic flow structures near the cylinders.Phase-locked PIV measurements are conducted during self-excited acoustic resonance to obtain flow field data at specific phases in the acoustic pressure cycle.,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207